ConservativeHome's The Republican

Source: The GOP Supercommittee members will not cave on taxes

John Rossomando 
Follow John on Twitter

A source close to senior GOP leaders says the Republicans on the Supercommittee will not cave on taxes contrary to published reports in places like The Washington Post suggesting otherwise.

On Wednesday Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin trumpeted that the GOP was about to cave on tax hikes saying in the Washington Post:

“It is a breakthrough,” he said. “I think you have to be honest. There haven’t been many who have stepped forward, except in our group [the Gang of Six], you know. They’ve been pretty forthright in our group. But the group appointed to the subcommittee, this is the first time – at least publicly – that we know that it’s on the table.”

But my source says this is utter nonsense and that the GOP will hold the line on taxes.

“It’s not going to happen,” he said.

But Democrats are keeping equally strident in their demand to soak the rich, which is making failure increasingly likely.

The Supercommittee is supposed to come up with a deal by Nov. 23 that would cut at least $1.2 trillion in deficits over 10 years, and the plan has to be approved by a majority of the panel itself.

But the truth is that it has been a farce since the beginning. It is far more likely that the Supercommittee will deadlock or come up with an 11^th hour deal that nobody likes.

Conservative pioneer Richard Viguerie is right on target over at his blog ConservativeHQ:

“In 2011 the government booked $ 2.1737 trillion in revenue and spent $3.8188, including $768.217 billion on national defense, to create a deficit of $1.6451 trillion. In FY 2007 the federal government spent $551.271 billion fighting two wars, provided benefits and conducted all its other business by spending $2.7287 trillion and booking $2.5680 in revenue for a deficit of $160.7 billion. Passing the FY 2007 Budget again would result in a defense cut of about half of what is called for in the sequestration formula and overall deficit reduction beyond the Super Committee goal.

The exercise of comparing the 2007 Budget to the 2011 Budget shows why conservatives are beginning to believe that Congressman Simpson and other insider Republicans make the problem of hitting the goal of $1.3 trillion in deficit reduction a whole lot more complicated that it needs to be. Deep down, they would be happy to institutionalize the outrageous levels of spending that Congress has approved since Obama was sworn in as President.”

And if the Republicans come up short, expect the Tea Party to come after them with a vengeance.

Newt comes out on top in debate

John Rossomando
Follow John on Twitter

Newt Gingrich came out as the clear winner of last night’s debate. He alone established an articulate vision for the nation’s future. The other candidates on the stage seemed to repeat the same stump speeches that everyone has heard over and over.

Americans want substance not bumper-sticker slogans. Newt’s answers were clear and thoughtful. Not to mention innovative.

Gingrich alone seemed to have a command on the meat of the issues, whether it was the establishment press’s failure to educate the public about how the economy works or how the student loan system should be replaced.

Only Santorum came close to Gingrich when it came to delivering thoughtful commentary. The former Pennsylvania senator was right on target when he asked the other candidates about what the nation will do about helping the nation’s blue-collar workers.

He’s right because blue-collar workers are the key swing voting bloc, and Republicans need a vision to move them out of the Obama column.

As long as Gingrich can spell out a positive alternative to the status quo he should be able to give Romney’s well-funded campaign a run for its money.

Herman Cain stuck to his message on his 9-9-9 plan, but as the campaign wears on it is hard to say whether he will be able to keep up on a single-issue.

But as Robert Stacey McCain writes in the American Spectator’s blog:

Ten days into the campaign crisis provoked by the accusations against him, Herman Cain is not yet out of the woods, but after Wednesday, he may be able to see sunshine breaking through the trees.

But Mitt Romney remains the placeholder frontrunner in the race in the wake of Rick Perry’s notorious brain fart.

But Gingrich alone has the ideas and the experience. That said, he needs to keep his eye on the ball and stay on message and avoid the sorts of gaffes he has been prone to. 

E-mails Show Obama Crony’s Involvement in WH Solyndra Loan Decisionmaking

John Rossomando
Follow John on Twitter

A fresh batch of e-mails have confirmed what I suspected last February when I became the first member of the Washington press corps to report on the Solyndra scandal – billionaire George Kaiser was personally involved in cutting deals with the Obama White House.

According to Atlantic Wire, the Obama White House was denying that Kaiser was involved as late as last month:

“White House officials have repeated the claim that they did not discuss the company and its loan with Kaiser. Last month Obama rejected the suggestion that political connections played a role, saying, "I have confidence decisions were made based upon what's good for the American people ... All I can say is the Department of Energy made these decisions based on their best judgments."

Now we find out this was a lie in the same way we have found out that Solyndra’s early denials that it had not received any money from the federal government was a lie.

“Your story today on Solyndra has several inaccuracies I wanted to point out,” Solyndra spokesman David Miller wrote to The Daily Caller on February 22, 2011. “For sake of accuracy … [T]he federal government has not spent a dime on Solyndra.”

Yet congressional testimony from last month revealed that story in fact was false.

Kaiser even said in an email to  Solyndra board member Steve Mitchell that White House aides he met with described Solyndra as “one of their prime poster children” for the stimulus. It sure has been, $535 million down the drain, and instead of creating thousands of new jobs it has done the exact opposite.

To borrow a cliché, “How far does this go down the rabbit hole?” Could the White House’s refusal to turn over further documents show that the rabbit himself, President Barack Hussein Obama, was directly involved? 

Cain needs a new team to win

John Rossomando
Follow John on Twitter

Herman Cain’s campaign has been a bit of a circus as of late. And to quote my friend, Tucker Carlson, he’s done a terrible job responding to the sexual harassment scandal. And that calls his ability to be in control as president into account.

He should have been out there and confronted the allegations right away instead of waiting a week before things got out of control. Now Cain’s chief of staff Mark Block has committed a cardinal sin of any political campaign – go on the attack without checking the facts first.

In journalism, we are taught “If your mother says she loves you, check it out.” What was he thinking when he fired blanks at Politico claiming that the son of one of the alleged sexual harassment victims works there? To make his irresponsible gaffe worse, Josh Kraushaar is not the son of accuser Karen Kraushaar, nor does he still work for Politico.

Now Michelle Malkin has come out with a blog saying that Block should go, making her the third major conservative figure to question Cain’s fitness:

“It’s his top aide and chief of staff Mark Block. This is now the second time he’s popped off with bogus assertions and insinuations. Not ready for prime time — or 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.”

Herman Cain has a great life story to tell as someone who has lived the American dream and who has gotten where he has by his own bootstraps. But his biggest problem is the people who he has running his campaign.

He should either clean house or concede defeat. It’s time for him to start seeing reality and get a team that can win. This is nothing compared what he would have to face in a general election race against Barack Obama.

Obama sidelines his Wall Street banker chief of staff

John Rossomando
Follow John on Twitter

Bill Daley came in from Wall Street to save the White House after Rahm Emanuel got the bright idea of running for Mayor of Chicago, but he now has been sidelined as Barack Obama’s chief of staff. What a timing coincidence.

Election season in full swing and Barack Obama knows one thing. He needs the Occupy Wall Streeters to show up in force next year and vote for him instead of staying home.

But he’s had a slight problem since the day he took office. He was bought and paid for by Wall Street bankers. And poor Mr. Daley is an inconvenient reminder of his ties to evil Wall Street.

Obama’s decision not to fire Daley outright, but his deciding to reduce his duties instead sort of is like stuffing the crazy uncle in the attic to keep the Occupy Wall Streeters from noticing his hypocrisy.

In September, I looked into Obama’s Wall Street largesse in  a piece I wrote for The Daily Caller and found:

Being Wall Street’s campaign cash king is hardly the image President Obama has been trying to project in public, where he has been setting himself up as the champion of the progressive Occupy Wall Street movement and as the avenger of jilted Bank of America customers.

“Banks can make money,” Obama said last week, responding to questions during an interview with ABC News about Bank of America’s decision to levy a $5 monthly fee on debit card users. “They can succeed, the old-fashioned way, by earning it.”

In fact, the Sunlight Foundation, a nonpartisan watchdog group that tracks lobbyist spending and influence in both parties, found that President Obama has received more money from Bank of America than any other candidate dating back to 1991.

An examination of the numbers shows that Obama took in $421,242 in campaign contributions in 2008 from Bank of America’s executives, PACs and employees, which exceeded its prior record contribution of $329,761 to President George W. Bush in 2004.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Wall Street firms also contributed more to Obama’s 2008 campaign than they gave to Republican nominee John McCain.

“The securities and investment industry is Obama’s second largest source of bundlers, after lawyers, at least 56 individuals have raised at least $8.9 million for his campaign,” Massie Ritsch wrote in a Sept. 18, 2008 entry on the Center for Responsive Politics’s OpenSecrets blog.

By the end of Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign, executives and others connected with Wall Street firms, such as Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citigroup, UBS AG, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley, poured nearly $15.8 million into his coffers.

 Obama can’t afford the political embarrassment of having a chief of staff who reminds people of his Wall Street ties.

But he still needs their dough to win re-election next year, but the decision to demote Daley will only help the eventual Republican nominee by increasing their Wall Street donor base.

It also serves as a warning that Obama is like a dog in a cage who will do anything to win re-election. The GOP needs to keep reminding Occupy Wall Street that Obama is the president from Wall Street.

Herman Cain's accusers shouldn't get a free pass

John Rossomando
Follow John on Twitter

The establishment press has taken a blind eye to the character and backgrounds of the women who have sniped at Herman Cain from the shadows over the past week.

The idea of having the Party of Lincoln nominate a black man for president scares the left because of its possible long-term ramifications for black America. And it is par for the course to have the Democrat-dominated press run stories attacking the character of Republican candidates while giving Democrats who engage in reckless sexual behavior a pass - our now elder statesman Bill Clinton anyone?

The allegations that people like Sharon Bialek have leveled against Herman Cain should be taken as seriously as Paula Jones’s charges against former President Bill Clinton were.

But Ms. Bialek and her fellow accusers should not be given a free pass to charge the first black man to credibly seek the Republican nomination with sexual harassment without being properly vetted.

The Clinton attack machine and its allies in the press mercilessly attacked Jones’s credibility, calling her “trailer park trash”. And former Clinton legal counsel Lanny Davis similarly questioned Juanita Broaddrick’s assertion that Clinton raped her in an interview with NBC News in 1999.

The Washington Post quoted Davis, the former White House special counsel, as assailing the Broaddrick story before the broadcast, saying:

"Is journalism about reporting facts or not? Where have we gone when an unsubstantiated allegation becomes a fact if others report it? It is not corroborated because her girlfriend saw her with a swollen lip. That doesn't make the charge of rape a fact."

The same standard needs to be applied by the press to who Ms. Bialek is and what her motivations have been to pick a time when Herman Cain is riding high in the polls to drop her bombshell claims.

The American Spectator’s W. James Antle III observes:

”That doesn't mean the charges are false, necessarily. I'm agnostic on that question myself. An attorney for one of the anonymous accusers told the New York Times that Bialek's story jibes with his client's experiences. But as was the case with Anita Hill and Paula Jones, the charges have not been leveled in a way that maximizes their credibility with people who are not already ideologically predisposed to believe them.”

Cain’s supporters are hardcore and unless tangible evidence emerges to prove these charges, the whole episode will blow over and become a footnote in the race at a time when most Americans are not paying close attention.

If this story were to have broken a year from now and Cain were the nominee, it would have had a far more devastating impact.

The Supercommittee is a super disaster

John Rossomando
Follow John on Twitter

The Supercommittee was a bad idea from the start, especially considering that the six Republicans and six Democrats on the committee barely speak the same language on fiscal issues.

It has been dead on arrival from the day the GOP leadership and President Obama announced its birth. Reports that the Supercommittee is deadlocked shouldn’t surprise anyone because the two parties are more polarized than any time at least since the Civil War.

The Democrats keep insisting on tax hikes as the solution to the debt and the deficit, while Republicans continue promising to cut spending and vowing not to yield on taxes.

The Charlotte Observer rightly observes:

"It's all driven by politics, of course, with members on both sides unwilling to break from the suicidal principles of their parties. That stubbornness threatens the country's long-term solvency."

According to The Heritage Foundation, continuing the status quo will result in the nation’s public debt reaching a dangerous 90 percent of our gross domestic product in a short 10 years.

The Heritage Foundation’s Alison Acosta Frazer warns:

“This is the crisis that Congress must address. Yet under the BCA, even assuming that the first round of scheduled cuts all occur, spending would be only $840 billion less over the next decade. When considering that the past three years’ deficits totaled $4 trillion, the BCA’s reductions are laughably small. The super committee’s charge to find an additional $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction is likewise deplorably inadequate.”

But the Democrats are not about to yield nor the Republicans at least at this point. The resulting defense cuts will be catastrophic. However, the endgame likely will be that the Republicans will concede the Democrats at the last minute as always happens.

Let’s be adults here and finish the job. And all of this is made worse by the fact the Supercommittee has been anything but transparent to the point that even other members of Congress have no idea what is going on.

Gingrich's resurgence is a victory for ideas over personalities

John Rossomando
Follow John on Twitter

Polls showing Newt Gingrich coming back from near oblivion are a positive development. ABCNews reports:

“Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has gained ground in the 2012 presidential campaign. He registered 12 percent support in an ABC News-Washington Post poll out this morning.

This is the former House speaker’s first time out of the single digits in the poll. He was polling at around 6 or 7 percent before.

“Any progress is good progress,” spokesman R.C. Hammond said. “What we’re looking to do is continually march toward the caucus and put forth ideas and solutions.”

The poll put Gingrich almost even with Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who was at 13 percent. Former Massachusetts Gov.  Mitt Romney stayed steady at 24 percent, and business executive Herman Cain saw an increase to 23 percent from 16 percent, despite his recent troubles.

The Gingrich campaign raised more than $1 million in October, its best fundraising month.”

Gingrich has always been a brain trust of original ideas, and having his thoughts front and center in the 2012 debate will put fresh ideas in the forefront.

Gingrich offers a refreshing change from the sleazy personality-driven politics of desperation offered by Gov. Rick Perry or Gov. Mitt Romney.

I’ve admired the former speaker for his originality going back to 1994’s Contract With America, which gave the GOP a burst of focus and energy.  His platform is not any different this time around.

Gingrich is no one-trick pony. He alone offers solid conservative solutions on all fronts. Micishelle Bachmann’s campaign seems solely focused on repealing Obamacare, Herman Cain’s campaign that has been heavy on sloganeering and economics or Rick Santorum’s which has take the social issues banner this time around.

His proposals are all forward-looking, especially in his continuing embrace of school choice for those trapped in failing schools. His plan would do the following among others:

“Empower parents to pick the right school for their child.  Parents had the right to choose the school that is best for their child, and should never be trapped in a failing school against their will.

Institute a Pell Grant-style system for Kindergarten through 12th Grade. Per-pupil school district funding should go into each child’s backpack, and follow them to the school their parents wish to attend. Parents who home school their children should receive a tax credit or be allowed to keep the Pell Grant.

Require transparency and accountability about achievement. Each state must set a rigorous standard that allows every student everywhere to master the skills they will need to be competitive, and develop a process for grading the effectiveness of every school.”

And he alone offers constructing solutions for what to do after Obamacare is repealed. His opponents all say they will repeal Obamacare, but only Gingrich presents ideas for what to do next, as he alone has dedicated considerable time on health care reform.

Americans want solutions, not endless bickering. And I am heartened that Gingrich and Cain decided to place ideas in the forefront rather than personalities with last night’s Lincoln-Douglass-style debate.

A Cain-Gingrich ticket or a Gingrich-Cain ticket would be an excellent combination because Cain’s showmanship and charisma would balance out Gingrich’s professorial demeanor. At the same time, Gingrich’s ideas would only serve to make Herman Cain a stronger candidate should be become the GOP nominee.

As The Washington Examiner's Byron York observes:

Gingrich could gain support in the future by moving closer to Cain now. At the moment, Cain has the very dedicated support of many conservative Republicans.  But after the rise and fall of Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry, many Republican insiders do not expect Cain to go the distance for the Republican nomination. 

If Cain were to fade, it's not a bad thing for Gingrich if Cain's supporters think of Gingrich fondly.  Should they find themselves looking for a new candidate to support, they might well turn to the former Speaker, who for many was their second choice all along.  At that moment, Gingrich could become the main challenger to frontrunner Mitt Romney.

The best possible GOP ticket would be one where the top and the bottom complement each other’s weaknesses, and I definitely see that here.

Raping civilization: Occupy Wall Street assaults society

John Rossomando
Follow John on Twitter

Civilization requires an obedience to the rule of law and respect for property, but the shear numbers of rapes, thefts and disregard for civilized behavior by Occupy Wall Street protesters shows their revolution aims to overthrow civilization itself.

These barbarians choose to eschew civilization and tear apart everything around them. The other day, I walked through Washington, D.C.’s McPherson Square, which had been one of the nicest parks in the city only to see that it had been torn apart by the illegal encampment. Grass has been replaced by mud and squalor, and camping tents.

I mention this because it shows the movement’s absolute contempt for property and their anarchistic desire to uproot every imaginable civilized norm. Women have especially fallen victim amid the movement’s amoral anarchy.

In New York, we now find according to the New York Post  that female are being protesters are  being asked to sleep in a separate tent for fear of being raped:

It’s a safe house from the sex fiends. Zuccotti Park has become so overrun by sexual predators attacking women in the night that organizers felt compelled to set up a female-only sleeping tent yesterday to keep the sickos away. The large, metal-framed “safety tent” -- which will be guarded by an all-female patrol -- can accommodate as many as 18 people and will be used during the day for women-only meetings, said Occupy Wall Street organizers. “This is all about safety in numbers,” said Becky Wartell, 24, a protester from Portland, Maine.

And in Washington, D.C., the movement’s disdain for women could be seen in its treatment of Michelle Fields, a female Daily Caller reporter of my acquaintance, according to Robert Stacey McCain over at the American Spectator blog:

Michelle Fields, a video reporter for the Daily Caller, said she was stalked for three hours Friday while attempting to cover protests outside the Americans for Prosperity "Defending the American Dream Summit" at the Washington Convention Center.

Fields said she "did not feel comfortable, because at one point there were a whole group of men surrounding me saying, ‘F-Michelle Fields.'  And I went to a police officer and I told him that I felt these people were harassing me. And the police officer said he'd take care of it, but it never ended. These people were harassing me for the entire evening."

The left disparaged the Tea Party as sexist, but I don’t recall women being treated in this manner by the Tea Party.

And Jim Nolte at Big Government documents a litany of reports from various Occupy protests around the country describing the Occupy Wall Street crime wave:

• NY: 10/1/2011 — Police Arrest More Than 700 Protesters on Brooklyn Bridge
• Madison, WI: 10-27-2011 — Madison Occupiers Lose Permit Due to Public Masturbation
• Phoenix: 10/28/2011 — Flier at Occupy Phoenix Asks, “When Should You Shoot a Cop?”
• NY: 10/18/2011 — Thieves Preying on Fellow Protesters
• NY: 10/9/2011 — Stinking up Wall Street: Protesters Accused of Living in Filth as Shocking Pictures Show One Demonstrator Defecating on a POLICE CAR
• NY: 10/7/2011 — Occupiers Rush Police … More
• Cleveland: 10/18/2011 —  ‘Occupy Cleveland’ Protester Alleges She Was Raped
• NY: 10/10/2011 — ‘Increasingly Debauched’: Are Sex, Drugs & Poor Sanitation Eclipsing Occupy Wall Street?
•  Seattle: 10/18/2011 — Man Accused of Exposing Self to Children Arrested
• 10/12/2011 — Iran Supports ‘Occupy Wall Street’
• Portland: 10/16/2011 – #OccupyPortland Protester Desecrates Memorial To U.S. War Dead
• Portland: 10/15/2011 — #OccupyPortland Protesters Sing “F*** The USA”
• Chicago: 10/17/2011 — COMMUNIST LEADER Cheered at Occupy Chicago
•  10/15/2011 — American Nazi Party Endorses Occupy Wall Street‘s ’Courage,‘ Tells Members to Support Protests and Fight ’Judeo-Capitalist Banksters’
•  Boston: 10/14/2011 — Coast Guard member spit on near Occupy Boston tents
•  Boston: 10/11/2011 — Boston Police Arrest Over 100 from Occupy Boston
•  New York: 10/11/2011 — “You Can Have Sex with Animals.”
•  New York: 10/15/2011 — Harassing Police with Accusations of Phony Injuries
•  New York: 10/9/2011 –  ‘Occupy Wallstreet’ Protesters Steal from Local Businesses
•  New York: 10/25/2011 — Three Men Threatened to Kill 24-Year-Old Occupy Wall Street Protester for Reporting Rape
•  Baltimore:  10/18/2011 — #OccupyBaltimore Discourages Sexual Assault Victims from Contacting Police
•  Portland: 10/27/2011 — Occupy Portland’s Attempt At Wealth Redistribution Ends In Theft
•  Los Angeles: 10/14/2011 – Anti-Semitic Protester at Occupy Wall Street
•  10/27/2011 — A Death Threat From an Occupy Wall Street Protester
•  10/27/2011 – Anti-Semitic Tweet From Occupier or Sympathizer
•  Boston: 10/20/2011 — Occupy Boston Doesn’t Want Police Involved in Rape
•  New York:  10/5/2011: Anti-Semitic Occupier Screams About Jews, Israel
•  New York: 10/4/2011 — Occupier Taunts Jewish Man
•  Boston: 10/2011 — Occupiers Block Street
•  New York: 10/2011 — Occupier Tries to Steal Police Officer’s Gun
• New York: 10/27/2011 — Occupiers Block Traffic, Get Arrested
• Oakland: 10/27/2011 — Occupiers Throw Garbage at Police
• Oakland:  10/19/2011 — Abusive #OccupyOakland Protesters Ban Media from Tent City
• Eugene, OR: 10/19/2011 — Occupiers Displace Farmers’ Market Threatening Hundreds of Jobs
• Portland, OR:  10/18/2011 — Capitalist Offering Jobs at Occupy Portland Finds Few Takers
•  NY:  10/20/2011 — #OccupyWallStreet Threatens Businesses, Patrons
•  NY: 10/14/2011 — Violence Breaks Out During #OccupyWallStreet March Toward Stock Exchange
•  NY: 10/14/2011 — Protesters March On Wall Street, Scuffle With Cops
•  Oakland: 10/19/2011 — #OccupyOakland Protesters Threaten Reporter
•  Oakland: 10/26/2011 — Occupiers Scuffle with Police
•  Oakland: 10/24/2011 — Protesters Storm, Vandalize, Shut Down Chase Bank
•  NY: 10/21/2011 — New Yorkers Fed Up With Noisy, Defecating Protesters
•  Oakland:  10/21/2011 — Occupy Oakland Evicted After Reports Of Crime And Intimidation
•  Oakland: 10/19/2011 — #OccupyOakland Out of Control: Rats, Graffiti, Vandalism, Sexual Harassment, Public Sex and Urination
•  Chicago: 10/26/2011 –  Occupiers Under Investigation by FBI for Links to Terrorism
•  Cleveland: 10/29/2011 — Rape Reported at Occupy Cleveland
•  Dallas: 10/24/2011 — Police Investigating Possible Sexual Assault Of Teen At Occupy Dallas
•  Bloomington, IN: 10/26/2011 — Man Claims Occupy Bloomington Protesters Drugged, Handcuffed Him
•  NY: 10/10/2011 — Sex, Drugs and Hiding from the Law at Wall Street Protests
•  Glasgow: 10/26/2011 — Woman Gang-Raped
•  Boston: 10/23/2011 — Occupy Boston Protesters Arrested For Dealing Heroin – With 6 Year-Old in Tent
•  Portland: 10/16/2011 –  Sex Offender Registers Occupy Portland Camp as Address
•  Denver: 10/15/2011 — Occupy Denver Demonstrator Accused of Groping TV Photographer
•  Lawrence, KS: 10/25/2011 — Sexual Assault Reported at Occupy Camp

And the list goes on. Then of course you have the riots in Oakland. Contrary to what the ignorant establishment press thinks, this movement isn’t after the banks or angry about no jobs. What they are really after is tearing down society itself.

These people seem to have far more in common with barbarian tribes like the Huns or Vikings than civilized American citizens who are trying to protest injustice.

FAREWELL AND THANK YOU

Ryan Streeter
Follow Ryan on Twitter

After a year with ConservativeHome, I am moving on. It has been a privilege to work with such a talented group of people, and I leave with both a bit of sadness that the work is ending for me and a lot of fond memories from the past year.

As some of you know, I live in Indianapolis, Indiana (not Washington, DC, as I’ve learned more than a few readers have assumed). The politics and policy needs of public life here in Indiana have begun to make demands on my time, such that I can no longer fulfill my responsibilities at ConservativeHome.

To stay in touch with me, you can email me at [email protected], or follow me on Twitter at www.twitter.com/streeterryan. In the coming weeks I will launch RyanStreeter.com as a way for friends, colleagues, and families to stay involved with my projects and work.

Kind regards,

Ryan Streeter